COP26: Just a load of hot air?

It's easy to be cynical about the promises being made at COP26 in Glasgow. We've heard it all before: promises are made, only to be broken. Cut methane emissions by 30%? Sure, we'll do that. End deforestation by 2030? No problem. But here's the thing: however frustrating the process may be, an agreement is still better than no agreement. 

That's because words do matter. Language is all about agreement, after all. There's nothing about the actual sounds of the words we use -- or the shapes of the letters we use to write them -- that has any meaning in itself. It's only because we all agree that certain combinations of sounds and shapes have particular meanings that we're able to understand each other in the first place. It's the basis of everything that makes us human, the secret of our civilisation. So when we use words to express a commitment, we're leveraging the fundamental nature of language. 

And we all understand how important that is: in every culture and every language, we know what it means to 'give your word'. It's the basis of all legal agreements, and the enforcement of law -- if you've agreed to do something, you are both legally and morally obliged to do it. So even if the COP26 agreements seem like easy promises, they're important nonetheless: the countries that make them can ultimately be held to account in the court of public opinion. And that's where the real power lies. Just as with every other major change, it's our voices that count. Let's use them.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Auditioning for an audiobook

Image
Just spent a fascinating few days listening to auditions sent in by prospective narrators for an audiobook version of my book SPEECH! How Language Made Us Human  -- which I hope will be released in mid-December (just in time for Xmas 😉). I've not done this before, and was astonished both at the range of voices sent in and the very different ways they chose to read the script I'd chosen for the audition -- the introduction to the book. As a writer, you inevitably hear your own voice as you write, so it's a rather odd experience to hear your words being read aloud not just in another voice, but even in a different persona. It must be even more extraordinary for a playwright or a scriptwriter, as their words are not only translated into different voices, but are literally brought to life in ways they may never have imagined.  They say a work of art no longer belongs to the artist once it is finished, because people will interpret it in different ways. It certainly felt like...
Read more

Why Talking Tough to Putin Won't Work

Image
Does anyone seriously think Vladimir Putin is going to back down just because we threaten him with more sanctions? Or supply a little more 'lethal aid' (in that weasel phrase) to Ukraine? Do we suppose that he hasn't anticipated all this, and already factored it into the equation? We're talking about a man who is playing chess, always working several moves ahead, and yet we seem to be playing checkers in response -- simply reacting to events as they happen.  Putin knows, for example, the extent of what we can do. And he also knows the extent of what we can't, or won't be willing to do. On top of that, he knows that what he can do by way of retaliation will be far worse: as well as vital supplies of gas and oil, Russia supplies significant percentages of key raw materials for the high-tech industries -- titanium, palladium and rare-earth minerals. Cutting off those would really hurt the economies of Europe and America. It would also cut off a huge source of Russi...
Read more

Ukraine: Time to stand up and be counted...

Image
Boris Yeltsin, P resident Bill Clinton, Leonid Kuchma  and John Major signing the Budapest Memorandum in December 1994 Let’s just get this straight. At the last count Vladimir Putin was in violation of at least three international treaties that the Russian Federation is signed up to. First, the UN Charter, which amongst other things prohibits signatories from using force – or even the threat of it – in the settlement of international disputes. Second, the 1994 Budapest Memorandum, which commits them to respecting the sovereignty of Ukraine within its existing borders. And third, the protocol of the Geneva Convention, which prohibits attacks on “installations containing dangerous forces” – such as the nuclear power station they’ve been shelling. Not to mention that the intentional targeting of civilians and civilian buildings also constitutes a crime under international humanitarian law. No matter what the justification, Putin is way out of line. Yet so far, he's getting away with i...
Read more