VIGILANCE IS WHAT WE NEED, NOT VIGILANTES


"The price of liberty is eternal vigilance" is a famous phrase, often attributed to Thomas Jefferson – though it seems doubtful that he actually said it. But a similar sentiment has been repeated by many others since – perhaps no more powerfully than by the abolitionist Wendell Phillips, who gave the proper context for the expression in a speech to the Massachusetts Anti-Slavery Society in 1852: "(because) power is ever stealing from the many to the few."

And that is the story of human civilisation, right there. If all power corrupts and absolute power corrupts absolutely, then the only way to free ourselves from the atavistic law of the jungle – that "might is right" – is to enact laws that restrict what those in power can do. Why does that matter? Because societies can only grow effectively through the open exchange of ideas in an environment free from fear and discrimination. Tyranny can never provide that.

That equation – the restriction of power through law – is the ladder up which humanity has slowly climbed through history, imperfect and inadequate as our progress still may be. And at the top of that ladder is the framework created in 1945 at the end of World War II: the UN Charter. It's a crucial milestone because, for the first time ever, the whole world came together to recognise that war between nation states is no longer an acceptable means of settling disputes – not least because of the terrible power of the weapons available to us.

And yet despite that overarching framework, we have not been sufficiently vigilant in maintaining and enforcing the peace and freedom from war that the Charter was designed to give us. Though we have had no more unrestrained 'world' wars since 1945, ongoing attempts to settle disputes through violence continue to scar the conscience of the world; it seems we are not brave enough to stand up for the principles we have all signed up to.

That's a recipe for abuse. For if the international community is not prepared to vigilantly police the rules it has put in place to ensure a world free from war, the door is left open for opportunist action and vigilantism. And these are the things we now see flourishing in the world around us, even as they threaten to escalate to terrible levels of destruction. Worse, we see the most powerful countries aiding and abetting that lawless violence.

Watching from a safe distance, we may perhaps feel it has little to do with us. But no-one is immune from its effects – we are all part of this. Without an insistence on the letter as well as the spirit of the law, we slide back into a world where the strong dominate the weak. As Frederick Douglass so eloquently put it: "It is in strict accordance with all philosophical, as well as experimental knowledge, that those who unite with tyrants to oppress the weak and helpless, will sooner or later find the groundwork of their own liberties giving way."

We see that in the gradual shift to the right across the developed world. Without vigilance, vigilantes are emboldened and come to the fore. And without pushback, that slowly eats away at the rest of our civilized norms. Russia has no business attacking Ukraine, a sovereign country. Israel has no business violating the international and humanitarian law it so perversely claims to champion. But unless our leaders stand up for these principles and hold transgressors to account, the future of liberty remains at risk.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Auditioning for an audiobook

Image
Just spent a fascinating few days listening to auditions sent in by prospective narrators for an audiobook version of my book SPEECH! How Language Made Us Human  -- which I hope will be released in mid-December (just in time for Xmas 😉). I've not done this before, and was astonished both at the range of voices sent in and the very different ways they chose to read the script I'd chosen for the audition -- the introduction to the book. As a writer, you inevitably hear your own voice as you write, so it's a rather odd experience to hear your words being read aloud not just in another voice, but even in a different persona. It must be even more extraordinary for a playwright or a scriptwriter, as their words are not only translated into different voices, but are literally brought to life in ways they may never have imagined.  They say a work of art no longer belongs to the artist once it is finished, because people will interpret it in different ways. It certainly felt like...
Read more

Why Talking Tough to Putin Won't Work

Image
Does anyone seriously think Vladimir Putin is going to back down just because we threaten him with more sanctions? Or supply a little more 'lethal aid' (in that weasel phrase) to Ukraine? Do we suppose that he hasn't anticipated all this, and already factored it into the equation? We're talking about a man who is playing chess, always working several moves ahead, and yet we seem to be playing checkers in response -- simply reacting to events as they happen.  Putin knows, for example, the extent of what we can do. And he also knows the extent of what we can't, or won't be willing to do. On top of that, he knows that what he can do by way of retaliation will be far worse: as well as vital supplies of gas and oil, Russia supplies significant percentages of key raw materials for the high-tech industries -- titanium, palladium and rare-earth minerals. Cutting off those would really hurt the economies of Europe and America. It would also cut off a huge source of Russi...
Read more

Ukraine: Time to stand up and be counted...

Image
Boris Yeltsin, P resident Bill Clinton, Leonid Kuchma  and John Major signing the Budapest Memorandum in December 1994 Let’s just get this straight. At the last count Vladimir Putin was in violation of at least three international treaties that the Russian Federation is signed up to. First, the UN Charter, which amongst other things prohibits signatories from using force – or even the threat of it – in the settlement of international disputes. Second, the 1994 Budapest Memorandum, which commits them to respecting the sovereignty of Ukraine within its existing borders. And third, the protocol of the Geneva Convention, which prohibits attacks on “installations containing dangerous forces” – such as the nuclear power station they’ve been shelling. Not to mention that the intentional targeting of civilians and civilian buildings also constitutes a crime under international humanitarian law. No matter what the justification, Putin is way out of line. Yet so far, he's getting away with i...
Read more